Health Services Management Research > Volume 21, Number 2 > Pp. 131-140

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Villa, S. Articles by Borgonovi, E. PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Getting health reforms right: what lessons from an Italian case?

Stefano Villa ^* , Daniele Alesani ^* and Elio Borgonovi 

* Center for Research in Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS); Institute of Public Administration and Health Care Management (IPAS), Bocconi University, Milan, Italy

Correspondence to: Stefano Villa Email: stefano.villa{at}unibocconi.it

Over the past few years (2001–2007), the Italian National Health Service has been undergoing an important process of decentralization with a significant transfer of powers and responsibilities from the central government to the Regions. In this context, a particularly innovative example is represented by the case of Marche Region that extensively reformed its health-care system. For the analysis of this case, we used a theoretical framework that describes a health-care system in terms of components and goals. Policy-makers can act on the structural components of the system influencing the behaviour of individuals and organizations in order to lead the system towards the achievement of key performance goals. Marche regional Government was able to improve the system in crucial areas (clinical appropriateness and economic equilibrium) by intervening on institutional arrangements (particularly on the number and dimension of health-care delivery organizations) and on key control knobs (particularly planning and control mechanisms and the information system). Some conditions have allowed Marche policy-maker to successfully carry out this extensive process of reforms, particularly: (1) a shared sense of urgency; (2) agreement on the identification of problems and on the relative reform strategies to adopt; (3) coordination of all change strategies through a precise and clear long-term plan aimed at developing an integrated health-care delivery network.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?